Comparative Analysis of Hybrid DC Breaker and Assembly HVDC Breaker

TL;DR

This paper compares hybrid DC breaker and assembly HVDC breaker in VSC-based HVDC systems, analyzing their operational speed, behavior, and current capacity through simulations to determine their effectiveness in fault protection.

Contribution

It introduces a comparative analysis of two HVDC breaker designs using simulation, incorporating a dual voting system for fault decision-making and fail-safe operation.

Findings

Hybrid and assembly breakers are evaluated for speed and current capacity.

Simulation results highlight differences in operational behavior.

Dual Modular Redundancy enhances fault detection reliability.

Abstract

Voltage Source Converters (VSC) are becoming more common in modern High Voltage DC (HVDC) transmission systems. One of the major challenges in a multi-terminal VSCHVDC is protection against DC side faults. Two major designs, namely, the hybrid DC breaker and the assembly HVDC breaker, are compared for operational behavior, speed of operation and current carrying capability. The Dual Modular Redundancy (DMR) technique is utilized for decision making of a fault scenario. This uses a dual voting system when one result contradicts the other. This helps in the design of a fail-safe mechanism for the operation of both types of breakers. Current threshold combined with directional change is considered for the breaker operation. A three-terminal bipolar VSC HVDC system is designed in PSCAD/EMTDC and simulation results are utilized to draw a comparison of the two different designs of DC breakers.