Cross-country comparisons of scientific performance by focusing on post-apartheid South Africa
S. M. Hosseini Jenab

TL;DR
This study analyzes South Africa's scientific performance from 1994 to 2014 across quantity, impact, and quality, comparing it with global trends and other countries to understand its transition to a knowledge-based economy.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive, relative indicator-based assessment of South Africa's scientific development over two decades, highlighting its position amidst global and regional competitors.
Findings
South Africa's scientific performance steadily increased over the period.
Its global position remained stable despite growth.
Countries like China and Turkey showed rapid improvements.
Abstract
This paper examines the scientific performance of South Africa since 1994 (post-apartheid) until 2014 in comparisons with the rest of the world, utilizing relative indicator. It provides a view over current standing of South Africa in the scientific world as well as its temporal evolution after the apartheid. This study focuses on four major aspects of scientific performance, namely quantity, productivity, impact and quality, as the main attributes of scientific perfomance on national level. These are measured by re-based (relative) publication, publication per population or GDP, citations and citations per publication respectively. The study focuses on scientific outputs (in the form of papers published in peer-reviewed journals) and their impact (measured by the citations they have received) to bring into a light a homogeneous comprehension of South Africa's scientific performance in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicsscientometrics and bibliometrics research · Health and Medical Research Impacts
