Bayesian monotonic errors-in-variables models with applications to pathogen susceptibility testing
Glen DePalma, Bruce A. Craig

TL;DR
This paper introduces Bayesian monotonic errors-in-variables models, including a four-parameter logistic and a nonparametric spline, to improve calibration between MIC and DIA antimicrobial susceptibility assays, enhancing accuracy and precision.
Contribution
It extends Craig's model-based calibration approach by incorporating Bayesian four-parameter logistic and spline models, with novel methods for spline knot selection.
Findings
Bayesian models outperform traditional calibration methods in simulations.
Spline models with adaptive knot selection improve fit to real data.
The proposed methods provide more accurate DIA breakpoint estimates.
Abstract
Drug dilution (MIC) and disk diffusion (DIA) are the two most common antimicrobial susceptibility assays used by hospitals and clinics to determine an unknown pathogen's susceptibility to various antibiotics. Since only one assay is commonly used, it is important that the two assays give similar results. Calibration of the DIA assay to the MIC assay is typically done using the error-rate bounded method, which selects DIA breakpoints that minimize the observed discrepancies between the two assays. In 2000, Craig proposed a model-based approach that specifically models the measurement error and rounding processes of each assay, the underlying pathogen distribution, and the true monotonic relationship between the two assays. The two assays are then calibrated by focusing on matching the probabilities of correct classification (susceptible, indeterminant, and resistant). This approach…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
