On the relative bias of void tracers in the Dark Energy Survey
G. Pollina, N. Hamaus, K. Paech, K. Dolag, J. Weller, C. S\'anchez, E., S. Rykoff, B. Jain, T. M. C. Abbott, S. Allam, S. Avila, R. A. Bernstein, E., Bertin, D. Brooks, D. L. Burke, A. Carnero Rosell, M. Carrasco Kind, J., Carretero, C. E. Cunha, C. B. D'Andrea, L. N. da Costa

TL;DR
This paper investigates the relative bias between different tracers of large-scale structure around cosmic voids, confirming a linear relation that varies with void size, using simulations and DES data, and provides a new void catalogue.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the relation between galaxy and cluster density profiles around voids is linear and environment-dependent, supported by simulations and DES data, and introduces a void catalogue from photometric data.
Findings
The density profiles of different tracers around voids are linearly related.
The relative bias varies with void size, being higher for smaller voids.
A new catalogue of 3D voids from photometric survey data is presented.
Abstract
Luminous tracers of large-scale structure are not entirely representative of the distribution of mass in our Universe. As they arise from the highest peaks in the matter density field, the spatial distribution of luminous objects is biased towards those peaks. On large scales, where density fluctuations are mild, this bias simply amounts to a constant offset in the clustering amplitude of the tracer, known as linear bias. In this work we focus on the relative bias between galaxies and galaxy clusters that are located inside and in the vicinity of cosmic voids, extended regions of relatively low density in the large-scale structure of the Universe. With the help of hydro-dynamical simulations we verify that the relation between galaxy and cluster overdensity around voids remains linear. Hence, the void-centric density profiles of different tracers can be linked by a single multiplicative…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
