Renormalization of quantum dot $g$-factor in superconducting Rashba nanowires
Olesia Dmytruk, Denis Chevallier, Daniel Loss, and Jelena Klinovaja

TL;DR
This paper investigates how the $g$-factor in superconducting Rashba nanowires is renormalized due to quantum dot formation and spin-orbit interaction, revealing universal behaviors and experimental implications for topological phase tuning.
Contribution
It provides analytical and numerical insights into $g$-factor renormalization in Rashba nanowires, highlighting universal dependencies and experimental methods to determine spin-orbit interaction strengths.
Findings
$g$-factor suppressed exponentially or by power-law depending on confinement.
Universal $g$-factor saturation at strong SOI and specific chemical potentials.
Pronounced peak of $g$-factor at the SOI energy as a function of chemical potential.
Abstract
We study analytically and numerically the renormalization of the -factor in semiconducting Rashba nanowires (NWs), consisting of a normal and superconducting section. If the potential barrier between the sections is high, a quantum dot (QD) is formed in the normal section. For harmonic (hard-wall) confinement, the effective -factor of all QD levels is suppressed exponentially (power-law) in the product of the spin-orbit interaction (SOI) wavevector and the QD length. If the barrier between the two sections is removed, the -factor of the emerging Andreev bound states is suppressed less strongly. In the strong SOI regime and if the chemical potential is tuned to the SOI energy in both sections, the -factor saturates to a universal constant. Remarkably, the effective -factor shows a pronounced peak at the SOI energy as function of the chemical potentials. In addition, if the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
