Assessing robustness of radiomic features by image perturbation
Alex Zwanenburg, Stefan Leger, Linda Agolli, Karoline Pilz, Esther, G.C. Troost, Christian Richter, and Steffen L\"ock

TL;DR
This study evaluates the robustness of radiomic features against image perturbations in CT scans, proposing a chain of perturbation methods to identify reliable features for reproducible radiomic analysis.
Contribution
The paper introduces a novel perturbation chain method to assess radiomic feature robustness, reducing false positives compared to traditional test-retest approaches.
Findings
Robust features are more prevalent in NSCLC than HNSCC.
The proposed perturbation chain effectively identifies robust features with fewer false positives.
Robust features can be reliably used for predictive modeling in radiomics.
Abstract
Image features need to be robust against differences in positioning, acquisition and segmentation to ensure reproducibility. Radiomic models that only include robust features can be used to analyse new images, whereas models with non-robust features may fail to predict the outcome of interest accurately. Test-retest imaging is recommended to assess robustness, but may not be available for the phenotype of interest. We therefore investigated 18 methods to determine feature robustness based on image perturbations. Test-retest and perturbation robustness were compared for 4032 features that were computed from the gross tumour volume in two cohorts with computed tomography imaging: I) 31 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients; II): 19 head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients. Robustness was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient (1,1) (ICC). Features with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
