Performance analysis of heat and energy recovery ventilators using exergy analysis and nonequilibrium thermodynamics

TL;DR

This paper applies exergy analysis and nonequilibrium thermodynamics to evaluate heat and energy recovery ventilators, providing a comprehensive performance metric and insights into optimizing ventilation systems under various conditions.

Contribution

It introduces exergy efficiency as a unified performance indicator for recovery ventilators and demonstrates its application to heat and membrane energy recovery systems.

Findings

Exergy efficiency effectively identifies beneficial operating conditions.

The analysis reveals mechanisms of work potential loss.

Exergy analysis simplifies comparison of different recovery devices.

Abstract

The increased attention to energy savings has contributed to more widespread use of energy recovery systems for building ventilation. We investigate the efficiency of such systems under different outdoor conditions using exergy analysis and nonequilibrium thermodynamics. This analysis makes it possible to assess performance in terms of loss of work potential, to account for the different quality of energy and to localize and compare the different sources of loss in the system. It also enables the use of exergy efficiency as a single performance parameter, in contrast to the several indicators that are commonly used. These more common indicators are difficult to compare and relate to each other. Further, since there is no obvious optimal trade-off between them, it is challenging to combine them and develop a global performance indicator that allows for a sensible comparison of different technical solutions and different types of recovery devices. We illustrate the concepts by applying the analysis to a heat recovery ventilator (HRV) and to a structurally similar membrane energy recovery ventilator (MERV) that can exchange both heat and moisture. We show how the exergy efficiency can be used to identify the range of operating conditions for which the recovery ventilator is not beneficial as the energy cost is greater than the energy recovery. This is not trivial using traditional performance parameters, yet it is a natural outcome of exergy analysis. In addition, we identify the mechanism by which work potential is lost, which can help the eventual optimization of both the recovery process and the auxiliary systems present in ventilation systems.