Empirical relations for the accurate estimation of stellar masses and radii
Andy Moya, Federico Zuccarino, William J. Chaplin, and Guy R. Davies

TL;DR
This study develops and validates 38 new empirical relations for accurately estimating stellar masses and radii using diverse observational data, achieving over 10% precision for most cases.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive set of empirically derived relations for stellar parameter estimation, utilizing a large, heterogeneous sample and advanced regression techniques.
Findings
38 new or revised relations with adj-R2 > 0.85
Achieved better than 10% accuracy and precision in most estimates
Relations cover nearly all observable combinations for stellar parameters
Abstract
In this work, we have taken advantage of the most recent accurate stellar characterizations carried out using asteroseismology, eclipsing binaries and interferometry to evaluate a comprehensive set of empirical relations for the estimation of stellar masses and radii. We have gathered a total of 934 stars -- of which around two-thirds are on the Main Sequence -- that are characterized with different levels of precision, most of them having estimates of M, R, Teff, L, g, density, and [Fe/H]. We have deliberately used a heterogeneous sample (in terms of characterizing techniques and spectroscopic types) to reduce the influence of possible biases coming from the observation, reduction, and analysis methods used to obtain the stellar parameters. We have studied a total of 576 linear combinations of Teff, L, g, density, and [Fe/H] (and their logarithms) to be used as independent variables to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
