An Analysis of ALMA Deep Fields and the Perceived Dearth of High-z Galaxies
Caitlin M. Casey, Jacqueline Hodge, Jorge A. Zavala, Justin Spilker,, Elisabete da Cunha, Johannes Staguhn, Steven L. Finkelstein, Patrick Drew

TL;DR
This study extends galaxy evolution models to ALMA deep field data, showing that current observations are consistent with existing infrared luminosity functions and suggesting future surveys are needed to better understand high-redshift dusty galaxies.
Contribution
It demonstrates that ALMA deep field counts align with larger-scale IRLF constraints and highlights the need for revised survey strategies to detect early Universe dusty galaxies.
Findings
ALMA counts constrain the faint-end slope of IRLF at z<2.5
Millimeter emission from z>4 UV galaxies is consistent with dust models
Future 2mm surveys are promising for detecting early dusty galaxies
Abstract
Deep, pencil-beam surveys from ALMA at 1.1-1.3mm have uncovered an apparent absence of high-redshift dusty galaxies, with existing redshift distributions peaking around . This has led to a perceived dearth of dusty systems at , and the conclusion, according to some models, that the early Universe was relatively dust-poor. In this paper, we extend the backward evolution galaxy model described by Casey et al. (2018) to the ALMA regime (in depth and area) and determine that the measured number counts and redshift distributions from ALMA deep field surveys are fully consistent with constraints of the infrared luminosity function (IRLF) at determined by single-dish submillimeter and millimeter surveys conducted on much larger angular scales (deg). We find that measured 1.1-1.3mm number counts are most constraining for the measurement of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
