Radiation-hydrodynamic simulations of thermally-driven disc winds in X-ray binaries: A direct comparison to GRO J1655-40
Nick Higginbottom, Christian Knigge, Knox S. Long, James H. Matthews,, Stuart A. Sim, Henrietta A. Hewitt

TL;DR
This study presents the first radiation-hydrodynamic simulations of thermally-driven disc winds in X-ray binaries, incorporating frequency-dependent attenuation, and compares results with observations of GRO J1655-40 to evaluate thermal driving as a wind mechanism.
Contribution
It introduces coupled radiation-hydrodynamic simulations that account for frequency-dependent attenuation, improving upon previous models of thermally-driven disc winds in X-ray binaries.
Findings
Mass-loss rate is about 5 times lower than pure hydrodynamic models.
Simulated absorption lines are slightly weaker than observed.
Thermal driving remains a viable mechanism for disc winds in LMXBs.
Abstract
Essentially all low-mass X-ray binaries (LMXBs) in the soft state appear to drive powerful equatorial disc winds. A simple mechanism for driving such outflows involves X-ray heating of the top of the disc atmosphere to the Compton temperature. Beyond the Compton radius, the thermal speed exceeds the escape velocity, and mass loss is inevitable. Here, we present the first coupled radiation-hydrodynamic simulation of such thermally-driven disc winds. The main advance over previous modelling efforts is that the frequency-dependent attenuation of the irradiating SED is taken into account. We can therefore relax the approximation that the wind is optically thin throughout which is unlikely to hold in the crucial acceleration zone of the flow. The main remaining limitations of our simulations are connected to our treatment of optically thick regions. Adopting parameters representative of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
