Comparing Two Generations of Embedded GPUs Running a Feature Detection Algorithm
Max Danielsson, H{\aa}kan Grahn, Thomas Sievert, Jim Rasmusson

TL;DR
This paper compares two generations of embedded GPUs in mobile devices, analyzing their performance, temperature, and architectural differences while running a feature detection algorithm, demonstrating potential for real-time applications.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of embedded GPU architectures on mobile devices for computer vision tasks, highlighting performance and design considerations.
Findings
Performance is approaching real-time levels.
GPUs do not exhibit temperature issues.
Support for large work-groups is crucial.
Abstract
Graphics processing units (GPUs) in embedded mobile platforms are reaching performance levels where they may be useful for computer vision applications. We compare two generations of embedded GPUs for mobile devices when running a state-of-the-art feature detection algorithm, i.e., Harris-Hessian/FREAK. We compare architectural differences, execution time, temperature, and frequency on Sony Xperia Z3 and Sony Xperia XZ mobile devices. Our results indicate that the performance soon is sufficient for real-time feature detection, the GPUs have no temperature problems, and support for large work-groups is important.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques · Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization · Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
