Symmetries in exact Bohrification
Klaas Landsman, Bert Lindenhovius

TL;DR
This paper explores the structure of commutative subalgebras within noncommutative C*-algebras in quantum mechanics, revealing that these subalgebras encode significant information about the algebra and its symmetries.
Contribution
It provides a detailed proof that the poset of commutative subalgebras determines a C*-algebra as a Jordan algebra and introduces a new Wigner-type theorem for order isomorphisms.
Findings
C(A) determines A as a Jordan algebra for many C*-algebras
Order isomorphisms of C(B(H)) are (anti) unitarily implemented
C(A) relates to the orthomodular poset of projections P(A)
Abstract
The `Bohrification" program in the foundations of quantum mechanics implements Bohr's doctrine of classical concepts through an interplay between commutative and non-commutative operator algebras. Following a brief conceptual and mathematical review of this program, we focus on one half of it, called "exact" Bohrification, where a (typically noncommutative) unital C*-algebra A is studied through its commutative unital C*-subalgebras, organized into a poset C(A). This poset turns out to be a rich invariant of A. To set the stage, we first give a general review of symmetries in elementary quantum mechanics (i.e., on Hilbert space) as well as in algebraic quantum theory, incorporating C(A) as a new kid in town. We then give a detailed proof of a deep result due to Hamhalter (2011), according to which C(A) determines A as a Jordan algebra (at least for a large class of C*-algebras). As a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
