Light-induced dipolar spectroscopy - A quantitative comparison between LiDEER and LaserIMD
Anna Bieber, Dennis B\"ucker, Malte Drescher

TL;DR
This study compares two light-induced dipolar spectroscopy techniques, LiDEER and LaserIMD, for nanometric distance measurements using triplet porphyrin labels, highlighting improvements and performance differences at Q band.
Contribution
It provides a quantitative comparison of LiDEER and LaserIMD under equivalent conditions and demonstrates how chirp inversion pulses enhance LiDEER performance.
Findings
Chirp LiDEER significantly improves modulation depth.
LaserIMD outperforms LiDEER at short dipolar evolution times.
LiDEER's performance benefits from broadband pump pulses.
Abstract
Nanometric distance measurements with EPR spectroscopy yield crucial information on the structure and interactions of macromolecules in complex systems. The range of suitable spin labels for such measurements was recently expanded with a new class of light-inducible labels: the triplet state of porphyrins. Importantly, accurate distance measurements between a triplet label and a nitroxide have been reported with two distinct light-induced spectroscopy techniques, (light-induced) triplet-nitroxide DEER (LiDEER) and laser-induced magnetic dipole spectroscopy (LaserIMD). In this work, we set out to quantitatively compare the two techniques under equivalent conditions at Q band. Since we find that LiDEER using a rectangular pump pulse does not reach the high modulation depth that can be achieved with LaserIMD, we further explore the possibility of improving the LiDEER experiment with chirp…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
