Global Comparison of Core-Collapse Supernova Simulations in Spherical Symmetry
Evan O'Connor, Robert Bollig, Adam Burrows, Sean Couch, Tobias, Fischer, Hans-Thomas Janka, Kei Kotake, Eric J. Lentz, Matthias, Liebend\"orfer, O. E. Bronson Messer, Anthony Mezzacappa, Tomoya Takiwaki,, David Vartanyan

TL;DR
This paper compares six different spherically symmetric core-collapse supernova simulation codes, demonstrating high agreement in key physical quantities and establishing a foundation for future multi-dimensional studies.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison of existing supernova simulation codes under controlled conditions, highlighting their agreement and setting the stage for more complex future simulations.
Findings
Excellent agreement in shock radius evolution
Consistent neutrino heating measurements
Foundation for multi-dimensional supernova modeling
Abstract
We present a comparison between several simulation codes designed to study the core-collapse supernova mechanism. We pay close attention to controlling the initial conditions and input physics in order to ensure a meaningful and informative comparison. Our goal is three-fold. First, we aim to demonstrate the current level of agreement between various groups studying the core-collapse supernova central engine. Second, we desire to form a strong basis for future simulation codes and methods to compare to. Lastly, we want this work to be a stepping stone for future work exploring more complex simulations of core-collapse supernovae, i.e., simulations in multiple dimensions and simulations with modern neutrino and nuclear physics. We compare the early (first ~500ms after core bounce) spherically-symmetric evolution of a 20 solar mass progenitor star from six different core-collapse…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
