Digital compensation of the side-band-rejection ratio in a fully analog 2SB sub-millimeter receiver
R. Rodriguez, R. Finger, F.P. Mena, A. Alvear, R. Fuentes, A., Khudchenko, R. Hesper, A.M. Baryshev, N. Reyes, L. Bronfman

TL;DR
This paper presents a digital method to improve sideband rejection ratios in fully analog 2SB sub-millimeter receivers without modifying the analog hardware, demonstrating high rejection and stability in real-world tests.
Contribution
The authors introduce a novel digital compensation technique that enhances sideband rejection in existing analog receivers without hardware changes, applicable across different configurations.
Findings
Achieved an average sideband rejection ratio of 46dB after compensation.
Minimal degradation of rejection ratio over time and after receiver resets.
Full analog receiver configuration shows greater robustness to systematic errors.
Abstract
In observational radio astronomy, sideband-separating receivers are preferred, particularly under high atmospheric noise, which is usually the case in the sub-millimeter range. However, obtaining a good rejection ratio between the two sidebands is difficult since, unavoidably, imbalances in the different analog components appear. We describe a method to correct these imbalances without making any change in the analog part of the sideband-separating receiver, specifically, keeping the intermediate-frequency hybrid in place. This opens the possibility of implementing the method in any existing receiver. We have built hardware to demonstrate the validity of the method and tested it on a fully analog receiver operating between 600 and 720GHz. We have tested the stability of calibration and performance vs time and after full resets of the receiver. We have performed an error analysis to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
