The flaw in the conformable calculus: it is conformable because it is not fractional
Ahmed A. Abdelhakim

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the conformable calculus, revealing that its conformability is misleading because it does not truly define a fractional derivative, exposing fundamental flaws in its theoretical foundation.
Contribution
It identifies and explains the core flaw in the conformable calculus, clarifying why it cannot serve as a valid fractional derivative.
Findings
Conformable calculus fails to define a genuine fractional derivative.
The conformability properties are misleading and originate from a misconception.
The paper clarifies the fundamental issues in the conformable calculus framework.
Abstract
We point out a major flaw in the conformable calculus. We demonstrate why it fails at defining a fractional derivative and where exactly these tempting conformability properties come from.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematical Analysis and Transform Methods · Advanced Harmonic Analysis Research · Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
