Interdependent Values without Single-Crossing
Alon Eden, Michal Feldman, Amos Fiat, Kira Goldner

TL;DR
This paper investigates welfare maximization in interdependent value auctions without the single-crossing condition, introducing a relaxed c-single-crossing notion and proposing mechanisms with approximation guarantees.
Contribution
It introduces the c-single-crossing condition, analyzes its implications, and develops prior-free mechanisms with approximation guarantees for welfare and revenue.
Findings
Randomized mechanism achieves 2c-approximation for welfare.
Deterministic mechanism achieves (n-1)c-approximation.
Mechanisms extend to revenue approximation.
Abstract
We consider a setting where an auctioneer sells a single item to potential agents with {\em interdependent values}. That is, each agent has her own private signal, and the valuation of each agent is a known function of all private signals. This captures settings such as valuations for artwork, oil drilling rights, broadcast rights, and many more. In the interdependent value setting, all previous work has assumed a so-called {\sl single-crossing condition}. Single-crossing means that the impact of agent 's private signal, , on her own valuation is greater than the impact of on the valuation of any other agent. It is known that without the single-crossing condition an efficient outcome cannot be obtained. We study welfare maximization for interdependent valuations through the lens of approximation. We show that, in general, without the single-crossing condition,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAuction Theory and Applications · Optimization and Search Problems · Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
