Strong Dependence of Type Ia Supernova Standardization on the Local Specific Star Formation Rate
M. Rigault, V. Brinnel, G. Aldering, P. Antilogus, C. Aragon, S., Bailey, C. Baltay, K. Barbary, S. Bongard, K. Boone, C. Buton, M. Childress,, N. Chotard, Y. Copin, S. Dixon, P. Fagrelius, U. Feindt, D. Fouchez, E., Gangler, B. Hayden, W. Hillebrandt, D. A. Howell, A. Kim

TL;DR
This study reveals a strong dependence of Type Ia supernova brightness on local star formation environment, significantly impacting their use in cosmology and dark energy measurements.
Contribution
It introduces a new classification based on local specific star formation rate that refines supernova standardization and reveals environment-dependent brightness systematic.
Findings
Supernovae in younger environments are significantly fainter after standardization.
The local environment dependence accounts for about 70% of the stellar mass step variance.
Standardization in younger environments reduces brightness dispersion, improving cosmological measurements.
Abstract
As part of an on-going effort to identify, understand and correct for astrophysics biases in the standardization of Type Ia supernovae (SNIa) for cosmology, we have statistically classified a large sample of nearby SNeIa into those located in predominantly younger or older environments. This classification is based on the specific star formation rate measured within a projected distance of 1kpc from each SN location (LsSFR). This is an important refinement compared to using the local star formation rate directly as it provides a normalization for relative numbers of available SN progenitors and is more robust against extinction by dust. We find that the SNeIa in predominantly younger environments are DY=0.163\pm0.029 mag (5.7 sigma) fainter than those in predominantly older environments after conventional light-curve standardization. This is the strongest standardized SN Ia brightness…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
