Eliminating Ensembles from Equilibrium Statistical Physics: Maxwell's Demon, Szilard's Engine, and Thermodynamics via Entanglement
Wojciech H. Zurek

TL;DR
This paper proposes that entanglement can replace ensembles in quantum statistical physics, enabling the description of equilibrium states in individual systems without relying on statistical ensembles, and explores implications for thermodynamics and information theory.
Contribution
It introduces a framework where entanglement replaces ensembles to describe equilibrium in individual quantum systems, simplifying the foundations of quantum statistical mechanics.
Findings
Entanglement can produce time-independent equilibrium states in individual quantum systems.
A single quantum system interacting with a heat bath can establish thermodynamics without ensembles.
The role of Maxwell's demon is analyzed in the context of quantum entanglement and measurement.
Abstract
A system in equilibrium does not evolve -- time independence is its telltale characteristic. However, in Newtonian physics the microstate of an individual system (a point in its phase space) evolves incessantly in accord with its equations of motion. Ensembles were introduced in XIX century to bridge that chasm between continuous motion of phase space points in Newtonian dynamics and stasis of thermodynamics: While states of individual classical systems inevitably evolve, a phase space distribution of such states -- an ensemble -- can be time-independent. I show that entanglement (e.g., with the environment) can yield a time-independent equilibrium in an individual quantum system. This allows one to eliminate ensembles -- an awkward stratagem introduced to reconcile thermodynamics with Newtonian mechanics -- and use an individual system interacting and therefore entangled with its heat…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
