Band gap and band offset of Ga$_2$O$_3$ and (Al$_x$Ga$_{1-x}$)$_2$O$_3$ alloys
Tianshi Wang, Wei Li, Chaoying Ni, Anderson Janotti

TL;DR
This study uses density functional theory to analyze the band gaps and band offsets of Ga$_2$O$_3$ and (Al$_x$Ga$_{1-x}$)$_2$O$_3$ alloys, providing key parameters for device design in UV photodetectors and transistors.
Contribution
The paper provides detailed computational analysis of the band structure and formation energies of (Al$_x$Ga$_{1-x}$)$_2$O$_3$ alloys, including phase-dependent properties and implications for electronic devices.
Findings
Alloy formation enthalpies are lower than for similar In-based alloys.
(Al$_x$Ga$_{1-x}$)$_2$O$_3$ with x=0.5 can be considered as an ordered compound.
Band gaps range from 4.69 to 7.03 eV for monoclinic and 5.26 to 8.56 eV for corundum phases.
Abstract
GaO and (AlGa)O alloys are promising materials for solar-blind UV photodetectors and high-power transistors. Basic key parameters in the device design, such as band gap variation with alloy composition and band offset between GaO and (AlGa)O, are yet to be established. Using density functional theory with the HSE hybrid functional, we compute formation enthalpies, band gaps, and band edge positions of (AlGa)O alloys in the monoclinic () and corundum () phases. We find the formation enthlapies of (AlGa)O alloys are significantly lower than of (InGa)O, and that (AlGa)O with =0.5 can be considered as an ordered compound AlGaO in the monoclinic phase, with Al occupying the octahedral sites and Ga occupying the tetrahedral sites. The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
