Heavy sterile neutrinos in stellar core-collapse
Tomasz Rembiasz, Martin Obergaulinger, Manuel Masip, M. \'Angeles, P\'erez-Garc\'ia, Miguel-\'Angel Aloy, Conrado Albertus

TL;DR
This study explores how hypothetical heavy sterile neutrinos could influence supernova explosions, potentially leading to new explosion mechanisms and observable signals, by simulating their production, decay, and energy transfer in stellar core-collapse.
Contribution
It introduces the first spherically symmetric simulations of core-collapse supernovae incorporating heavy sterile neutrinos, revealing their potential to cause successful explosions and unique observational signatures.
Findings
Sterile neutrinos can induce successful supernova explosions.
Explosion energies can be very high depending on neutrino parameters.
The resulting electromagnetic signals may differ significantly from typical supernovae.
Abstract
We perform spherically symmetric simulations of the core collapse of a single progenitor star of zero age main sequence mass with two models of heavy sterile neutrinos in the mass range of hundred MeV. According to both models, these hypothetical particles are copiously produced in the center, stream outwards a subsequently decay releasing energy into final states (including neutrinos) of the Standard Model. We find that they can lead to a successful explosion in otherwise non-exploding progenitors. Depending on their unknown parameters (e.g., mass and coupling constants with matter), we obtain either no explosion or an explosion of one of two types, i.e., through heating of gas downstream of the stalled shock wave, similarly to the standard scenario for supernova explosions or through heating of gas at higher radii that ejects matter from the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
