A redshift-independent efficiency model: star formation and stellar masses in dark matter halos at z>4
Sandro Tacchella, Sownak Bose, Charlie Conroy, Daniel J. Eisenstein,, Benjamin D. Johnson

TL;DR
This paper introduces a redshift-independent star formation efficiency model that accurately predicts UV luminosity functions and stellar masses of high-redshift galaxies, providing new insights into galaxy evolution at z>4.
Contribution
The study develops a novel, redshift-independent efficiency model calibrated at z=4, successfully predicting galaxy properties from z=5 to 10 and offering new relations between stellar mass and halo mass.
Findings
The stellar-to-halo mass relation scales as M_star ∝ M_h^2 for M_h<10^11 M_sun.
The model accurately reproduces observed UV luminosity functions at z=5-10.
Current cosmic SFR density estimates at z~10 may be overestimated by 0.1-0.2 dex.
Abstract
We explore the connection between the UV luminosity functions (LFs) of high- galaxies and the distribution of stellar masses and star-formation histories (SFHs) in their host dark matter halos. We provide a baseline for a redshift-independent star-formation efficiency model to which observations and models can be compared. Our model assigns a star-formation rate (SFR) to each dark matter halo based on the growth rate of the halo and a redshift-independent star-formation efficiency. The dark matter halo accretion rate is obtained from a high-resolution -body simulation in order to capture the stochasticity in accretion histories and to obtain spatial information for the distribution of galaxies. The halo mass dependence of the star-formation efficiency is calibrated at by requiring a match to the observed UV LF at this redshift. The model then correctly predicts the observed…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
