AI Should Not Be an Open Source Project
Dimiter Dobrev

TL;DR
The paper discusses the importance of controlling AI technology access to prevent misuse, emphasizing that AI benefits should be shared responsibly while restricting irresponsible access.
Contribution
It highlights the ethical and security considerations in AI ownership, advocating for controlled dissemination similar to nuclear technology.
Findings
AI benefits should be shared responsibly
Access restrictions are necessary to prevent misuse
Ethical considerations are crucial in AI deployment
Abstract
Who should own the Artificial Intelligence technology? It should belong to everyone, properly said not the technology per se, but the fruits that can be reaped from it. Obviously, we should not let AI end up in the hands of irresponsible persons. Likewise, nuclear technology should benefit all, however it should be kept secret and inaccessible by the public at large.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsScientific Computing and Data Management
