A bootstrap test for equality of variances
Dexter Cahoy

TL;DR
This paper presents a bootstrap-based statistical test for assessing whether multiple variances are equal, offering improved error control over existing methods through simulation validation.
Contribution
It introduces a novel bootstrap procedure for testing equality of variances, derived from a normal-theory framework, with a new box-type acceptance region.
Findings
The method outperforms Shoemaker and Levene tests in error control.
Simulation shows better Type I and II error rates.
The test is generally superior to existing variance equality tests.
Abstract
We introduce a bootstrap procedure to test the hypothesis that variances are homogeneous. The procedure uses a variance-based statistic, and is derived from a normal-theory test for equality of variances. The test equivalently expressed the hypothesis as , where 's are log contrasts of the population variances. A box-type acceptance region is constructed to test the hypothesis . Simulation results indicated that our method is generally superior to the Shoemaker and Levene tests, and the bootstrapped version of Levene test in controlling the Type I and Type II errors.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods and Inference · Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials · Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
