TL;DR
This paper introduces Protective Optimization Technologies (POTs), a novel approach enabling affected parties to mitigate harms from digital systems independently of service providers, addressing limitations of existing fairness frameworks.
Contribution
The paper proposes POTs as a new method for outside intervention that can correct or expose harms from systems without relying on service provider cooperation.
Findings
POTs can counter traffic congestion caused by traffic-beating apps.
POTs can recalibrate credit scoring systems for fairness.
POTs expand avenues for political contestation and harm mitigation.
Abstract
Algorithmic fairness aims to address the economic, moral, social, and political impact that digital systems have on populations through solutions that can be applied by service providers. Fairness frameworks do so, in part, by mapping these problems to a narrow definition and assuming the service providers can be trusted to deploy countermeasures. Not surprisingly, these decisions limit fairness frameworks' ability to capture a variety of harms caused by systems. We characterize fairness limitations using concepts from requirements engineering and from social sciences. We show that the focus on algorithms' inputs and outputs misses harms that arise from systems interacting with the world; that the focus on bias and discrimination omits broader harms on populations and their environments; and that relying on service providers excludes scenarios where they are not cooperative or…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
