Splitting loops and necklaces: Variants of the square peg problem
Jai Aslam, Shujian Chen, Florian Frick, Sam Saloff-Coste, Linus, Setiabrata, Hugh Thomas

TL;DR
This paper proves several variants of Toeplitz's square peg problem, including inscribing parallelograms and rectangles in loops, and introduces new methods connecting these geometric problems with fair division and Tverberg-type results.
Contribution
It establishes new inscribing results for loops in 3D and higher dimensions, and links geometric inscribing problems to fair division and Tverberg theory, offering a unified framework.
Findings
Any simple loop in 3-space inscribes a parallelogram.
Every simple planar loop inscribes many rectangles with dense vertices.
Rectifiable loops can be cut and rearranged into equal-length loops.
Abstract
Toeplitz conjectured that any simple planar loop inscribes a square. Here we prove variants of Toeplitz' square peg problem. We prove Hadwiger's 1971 conjecture that any simple loop in -space inscribes a parallelogram. We show that any simple planar loop inscribes sufficiently many rectangles that their vertices are dense in the loop (independently due to Schwartz). If the loop is rectifiable, there is a rectangle that cuts the loop into four pieces that can be rearranged to form two loops of equal length. A rectifiable loop in -space can be cut into pieces that can be rearranged by translations to form loops of equal length. We relate our results to fair divisions of necklaces in the sense of Alon and to Tverberg-type results. This provides a new approach and a common framework to obtain variants of Toeplitz' square peg problem for the class of all continuous…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
