Optimal and non-optimal lattices for non-completely monotone interaction potentials
Laurent B\'etermin (University of Copenhagen), Mircea Petrache (PUC)

TL;DR
This paper explores the energy minimization of d-dimensional Bravais lattices with various pairwise potentials, extending beyond completely monotone functions, and identifies conditions for optimality and non-optimality, including numerical and theoretical results.
Contribution
It introduces criteria for lattice minimality based on inverse Laplace transforms, constructs non-completely monotone potentials with specific minimizers, and links lattice energy minimization to the kissing problem.
Findings
Triangular lattice minimizes energy for certain non-completely monotone potentials.
Square lattice can have lower energy than triangular for specific one-well potentials.
Numerical evidence supports optimality of particular lattices across exponents.
Abstract
We investigate the minimization of the energy per point among -dimensional Bravais lattices, depending on the choice of pairwise potential equal to a radially symmetric function . We formulate criteria for minimality and non-minimality of some lattices for at fixed scale based on the sign of the inverse Laplace transform of when is a superposition of exponentials, beyond the class of completely monotone functions. We also construct a family of non-completely monotone functions having the triangular lattice as the unique minimizer of at any scale. For Lennard-Jones type potentials, we reduce the minimization problem among all Bravais lattices to a minimization over the smaller space of unit-density lattices and we establish a link to the maximum kissing problem. New numerical evidence for the optimality of particular lattices for all the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
