TL;DR
This study analyzes the structure of IPv6 hitlists, revealing clustering patterns and proposing methods to improve their quality, supported by a longitudinal measurement campaign and crowdsourced client data.
Contribution
Introduces novel techniques for analyzing and unbiasing IPv6 hitlists, including clustering and alias detection, with a comprehensive longitudinal measurement study.
Findings
Addresses in hitlists are heavily clustered.
1.5% of prefixes are aliased, covering half of target addresses.
Hitlists can be grouped into 6 addressing schemes.
Abstract
Network measurements are an important tool in understanding the Internet. Due to the expanse of the IPv6 address space, exhaustive scans as in IPv4 are not possible for IPv6. In recent years, several studies have proposed the use of target lists of IPv6 addresses, called IPv6 hitlists. In this paper, we show that addresses in IPv6 hitlists are heavily clustered. We present novel techniques that allow IPv6 hitlists to be pushed from quantity to quality. We perform a longitudinal active measurement study over 6 months, targeting more than 50 M addresses. We develop a rigorous method to detect aliased prefixes, which identifies 1.5 % of our prefixes as aliased, pertaining to about half of our target addresses. Using entropy clustering, we group the entire hitlist into just 6 distinct addressing schemes. Furthermore, we perform client measurements by leveraging crowdsourcing. To…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
