Gamma-ray flaring activity of NGC 1275 in 2016-2017 measured by MAGIC
MAGIC collaboration: S. Ansoldi, L. A. Antonelli, C. Arcaro, D. Baack,, A. Babi\'c, B. Banerjee, P. Bangale, U. Barres de Almeida, J. A. Barrio, J., Becerra Gonz\'alez, W. Bednarek, E. Bernardini, R. Ch. Berse, A. Berti, W., Bhattacharyya, C. Bigongiari, A. Biland, O. Blanch

TL;DR
This paper reports the detection and analysis of a significant gamma-ray flare from NGC 1275 in 2016-2017, revealing rapid variability, spectral features, and exploring possible emission mechanisms near the black hole.
Contribution
First detailed multi-wavelength analysis of NGC 1275's 2016-2017 gamma-ray flare, proposing magnetospheric gaps as a plausible emission site.
Findings
Detected a flare with flux 1.5 times the Crab Nebula above 100 GeV.
Measured shortest flux-doubling time of approximately 611 minutes.
Spectral analysis indicates a power-law with exponential cutoff at 492 GeV.
Abstract
We report on the detection of flaring activity from the Fanaroff-Riley I radio galaxy NGC 1275 in very-high-energy (VHE, E 100 GeV) gamma rays with the MAGIC telescopes. Observations were performed between 2016 September and 2017 February as part of a monitoring program. The brightest outburst with times the Crab Nebula flux above 100 GeV (C.U.) was observed during the night between 2016 December 31 and 2017 January 1 (fifty times higher than the mean previously measured in two observational campaigns between 2009 and 2011). Significant variability of the day-by-day light curve was measured, the shortest flux-doubling time-scales was found to be of min. The combined spectrum of the MAGIC data during the strongest flare state and simultaneous data from the Fermi-LAT around 2017 January 1 follows a power-law with an exponential cutoff at the energy …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
