The Araucaria Project: High-precision Cepheid astrophysics from the analysis of variables in double-lined eclipsing binaries
Bogumi{\l} Pilecki, Wolfgang Gieren, Grzegorz Pietrzy\'nski, Ian B., Thompson, Rados{\l}aw Smolec, Dariusz Graczyk, M\'onica Taormina, Andrzej, Udalski, Jesper Storm, Nicolas Nardetto, Alexandre Gallenne, Pierre Kervella,, Igor Soszy\'nski, Marek G\'orski, Piotr Wielg\'orski

TL;DR
This study uses high-precision observations and modeling of Cepheids in eclipsing binaries to refine physical parameters, establish empirical relations, and investigate the p-factor and companion star characteristics.
Contribution
It provides the most accurate physical parameters for several Cepheids, derives a new empirical period-mass-radius relation, and explores the variability of the p-factor and companion star properties.
Findings
Achieved 1% accuracy in mass and radius measurements.
Derived a tight empirical period-mass-radius relation for Cepheids.
Identified large dispersion in the p-factor, influenced by other stellar parameters.
Abstract
Based on new observations and improved modeling techniques, we have reanalyzed seven Cepheids in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Improved physical parameters have been determined for the exotic system OGLE LMC-CEP-1718 composed of two first-overtone Cepheids and a completely new model was obtained for the OGLE LMC-CEP-1812 classical Cepheid. This is now the shortest period Cepheid for which the projection factor is measured. The typical accuracy of our dynamical masses and radii determinations is 1%. The radii of the six classical Cepheids follow period--radius relations in the literature. Our very accurate physical parameter measurements allow us to calculate a purely empirical, tight period--mass--radius relation that agrees well with theoretical relations derived from non-canonical models. This empirical relation is a powerful tool to calculate accurate masses for single Cepheids for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
