Proton-Nucleus Elastic Scattering: Comparison between Phenomenological and Microscopic Optical Potentials
Matteo Vorabbi, Paolo Finelli, Carlotta Giusti

TL;DR
This paper compares microscopic optical potentials derived from chiral nucleon-nucleon forces with phenomenological models in describing proton elastic scattering on various nuclei at energies around 200 MeV, assessing their accuracy and predictive power.
Contribution
It demonstrates that N4LO chiral-based microscopic optical potentials can reliably predict elastic scattering observables across multiple isotopes and energies, including future experimental conditions.
Findings
Microscopic potentials match experimental data well for stable and exotic nuclei.
N4LO chiral potentials provide reliable predictions up to 333 MeV.
The approach offers a consistent framework for nuclear scattering analysis.
Abstract
Elastic scattering is a very important process to understand nuclear interactions in finite nuclei. Despite decades of efforts, the goal of reaching a coherent description of this physical process in terms of microscopic forces is still far from being completed. In previous papers (Phys. Rev. C93, 034619 (2016), Phys. Rev. C96, 044001 (2017)) we derived a nonrelativistic theoretical optical potential from nucleon-nucleon chiral potentials at fourth (N3LO) and fifth order (N4LO). We checked convergence patterns and established theoretical error bands. With this work we study the performances of our optical potential in comparison with those of a successful nonrelativistic phenomenological optical potential in the description of elastic proton scattering data on several isotopic chains at energies around and above 200 MeV. We use the same framework and the same approximations of our…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
