TL;DR
This paper investigates how linguistic context influences quantifier prediction, revealing that models excel in local contexts but struggle with global understanding, unlike humans who benefit from broader context.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison of human and model performance in quantifier prediction across different contextual scopes, highlighting strengths and limitations.
Findings
Models outperform humans in local context prediction.
Humans improve with global context, especially for proportional quantifiers.
Model performance declines with increased global context complexity.
Abstract
We study the role of linguistic context in predicting quantifiers (`few', `all'). We collect crowdsourced data from human participants and test various models in a local (single-sentence) and a global context (multi-sentence) condition. Models significantly out-perform humans in the former setting and are only slightly better in the latter. While human performance improves with more linguistic context (especially on proportional quantifiers), model performance suffers. Models are very effective in exploiting lexical and morpho-syntactic patterns; humans are better at genuinely understanding the meaning of the (global) context.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
