Dependence of optical Active Galactic Nuclei identification on stellar population models
Yan-Ping Chen (1), Ingyin Zaw (1, 2), Glennys R Farrar (2) ((1), New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, (2) Center, for Cosmology, Particle Physics, Physics Department, New York University,, New York, NY, USA)

TL;DR
This study quantifies how different stellar population models influence the optical spectroscopic identification of type II AGN, revealing significant systematic differences in AGN fractions depending on the model used.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of three stellar population models and their impact on AGN detection, highlighting the importance of template choice in spectroscopic surveys.
Findings
BC03 templates yield higher AGN fractions and false positives.
MS11solar templates result in lower AGN fractions and false negatives.
AGN identification fraction varies with galaxy luminosity.
Abstract
We have conducted a study to quantify the systematic differences resulting from using different stellar population models in optical spectroscopic identification of type II AGN. We examined the different AGN detection fractions of 7069 nearby galaxies (z <= 0.09) with SDSS DR8 spectra when using the Bruzual & Charlot (2003, BC03), Vazdekis et al. (2010, MILES), and solar metallicity Maraston and Stromback (2011) (MS11solar) stellar population models. The line fluxes obtained using BC03 and MS11solar are publicly available from SDSS data releases. We find that the BC03 templates result in systematically higher BPT line ratios and consequently higher AGN fractions and the MS11solar templates result in systematically lower line ratios and AGN fractions compared with the MILES templates. Using MILES as the standard, BC03 results in 25% "false positives" and MS11solar results in 22% "false…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
