Can the fluctuations of the quantum vacuum solve the cosmological constant problem?
Samuel S. Cree, Tamara M. Davis, Timothy C. Ralph, Qingdi Wang, Zhen, Zhu, and William G. Unruh

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether quantum vacuum fluctuations can explain the universe's slow acceleration, refining previous models and demonstrating that under certain conditions, these fluctuations could account for observed cosmic acceleration.
Contribution
The authors improve numerical methods and introduce a Mathieu equation model to better understand vacuum fluctuation effects on cosmic acceleration, supporting the viability of the proposed mechanism.
Findings
Refined numerical calculations show the resonance effect remains plausible.
A simple Mathieu equation model matches numerical results.
High-energy cutoff with many fields can produce observed acceleration.
Abstract
The cosmological constant problem arises because the magnitude of vacuum energy density predicted by quantum mechanics is about 120 orders of magnitude larger than the value implied by cosmological observations of accelerating cosmic expansion. Recently, some of the current authors proposed that the stochastic nature of the quantum vacuum can resolve this tension [Q, Wang, Z. Zhu, and W. G. Unruh, Phys. Rev. D 95, 103504, 2017]. By treating the fluctuations in the vacuum seriously and allowing fluctuations up to some high-energy cutoff at which Quantum Field Theory is believed to break down, a parametric resonance effect arises that leads to a slow expansion and acceleration. In this work, we thoroughly examine the implications of this proposal by investigating the resulting dynamics. First, we improve upon numerical calculations in the original work and show that convergence issues had…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
