Emptiness of Stack Automata is NEXPTIME-complete: A Correction
Christopher Broadbent, Arnaud Carayol, Matthew Hague, and Olivier, Serre

TL;DR
This paper corrects a previous claim by demonstrating that the emptiness problem for stack automata recognizing collapsible pushdown stacks is NEXPTIME-complete, not PSPACE-complete as previously stated.
Contribution
It clarifies the computational complexity of the emptiness problem for stack automata on collapsible pushdown stacks, establishing NEXPTIME-completeness.
Findings
Emptiness problem for collapsible pushdown stack automata is NEXPTIME-complete.
Previous claim of PSPACE-completeness was incorrect.
Provides a corrected complexity classification for the problem.
Abstract
A saturation algorithm for collapsible pushdown systems was published in ICALP 2012. This work introduced a class of stack automata used to recognised regular sets of collapsible pushdown configurations. It was shown that these automata form an effective boolean algebra, have a linear time membership problem, and are equivalent to an alternative automata representation appearing in LICS 2010. It was also claimed that the emptiness problem for stack automata is PSPACE-complete. Unfortunately, this claim is not true. We show that the problem is in fact NEXPTIME-complete when the stacks being accepted are collapsible pushdown stacks, rather than the annotated stacks used in ICALP 2012.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFormal Methods in Verification · semigroups and automata theory · Quantum-Dot Cellular Automata
