Why Botnets Work: Distributed Brute-Force Attacks Need No Synchronization
Salman Salamatian, Wasim Huleihel, Ahmad Beirami, Asaf Cohen, Muriel, M\'edard

TL;DR
This paper analyzes how distributed, asynchronous brute-force attacks by botnets can be as effective as synchronized attacks, showing that randomization enables optimal performance without coordination.
Contribution
It introduces a model for distributed brute-force attacks, demonstrating that asynchronous, randomized guessing can achieve asymptotic optimality similar to synchronized attacks.
Findings
Asynchronous attacks can match synchronized attack efficiency.
Randomized guessing is essential for optimal distributed attacks.
Asymptotic performance is achievable without synchronization.
Abstract
In September 2017, McAffee Labs quarterly report estimated that brute force attacks represent 20\% of total network attacks, making them the most prevalent type of attack ex-aequo with browser based vulnerabilities. These attacks have sometimes catastrophic consequences, and understanding their fundamental limits may play an important role in the risk assessment of password-secured systems, and in the design of better security protocols. While some solutions exist to prevent online brute-force attacks that arise from one single IP address, attacks performed by botnets are more challenging. In this paper, we analyze these distributed attacks by using a simplified model. Our aim is to understand the impact of distribution and asynchronization on the overall computational effort necessary to breach a system. Our result is based on Guesswork, a measure of the number of queries (guesses)…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
