Probabilistic enhancement of the Failure Forecast Method using a stochastic differential equation and application to volcanic eruption forecasts
Andrea Bevilacqua, E. Bruce Pitman, Abani Patra, Augusto Neri, Marcus, Bursik, Barry Voight

TL;DR
This paper presents a stochastic extension of the Failure Forecast Method for volcanic eruptions, incorporating uncertainty and providing probabilistic forecasts that improve prediction accuracy over traditional methods.
Contribution
The authors develop a doubly stochastic differential equation model that enhances the Failure Forecast Method by including uncertainty and mean reversion, offering probabilistic eruption forecasts.
Findings
The new model improves forecasting skill compared to statistical regression.
It provides a complete posterior probability distribution for eruption timing.
Application to historical data demonstrates increased prediction accuracy.
Abstract
We introduce a doubly stochastic method for performing material failure theory based forecasts of volcanic eruptions. The method enhances the well known Failure Forecast Method equation, introducing a new formulation similar to the Hull-White model in financial mathematics. In particular, we incorporate a stochastic noise term in the original equation, and systematically characterize the uncertainty. The model is a stochastic differential equation with mean reverting paths, where the traditional ordinary differential equation defines the mean solution. Our implementation allows the model to make excursions from the classical solutions, by including uncertainty in the estimation. The doubly stochastic formulation is particularly powerful, in that it provides a complete posterior probability distribution, allowing users to determine a worst case scenario with a specified level of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
