Comparing two models for measuring the neutron star equation of state from gravitational-wave signals
Matthew F. Carney, Leslie E. Wade, Burke S. Irwin

TL;DR
This paper compares two models for measuring the neutron star equation of state from gravitational-wave signals, demonstrating their effectiveness and differences in constraining the EoS, with implications for future gravitational-wave analyses.
Contribution
The study provides a detailed comparison of a spectral decomposition model and a piecewise polytrope model for EoS measurement, highlighting their relative performance and effects of prior choices.
Findings
Both models recover consistent tidal information from simulated signals.
The spectral model reduces statistical errors near fixed joining densities.
Prior choices significantly influence EoS constraints.
Abstract
Observations of gravitational-wave signals from binary neutron-star mergers, like GW170817, can be used to constrain the neutron-star equation of state (EoS). One method involves modeling the EoS and measuring the model parameters through Bayesian inference. A previous study has demonstrated the effectiveness of using a phenomenologically parameterized piecewise polytrope to extract constraining information from a simulated population of binary neutron-star mergers. Despite its advantages compared to more traditional methods of measuring the tidal deformability of neutron stars, notable deficiencies arise when using this EoS model. In this work, we describe in detail the implementation of a model built from a spectral decomposition of the adiabatic index that was used by the LIGO-Virgo Collaboration in to constrain the neutron star EoS from GW170817. We demonstrate its overall…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
