Combinatorial Auctions with Endowment Effect
Moshe Babaioff, Shahar Dobzinski, Sigal Oren

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that in combinatorial auctions, the endowment effect among bidders can ensure the existence of Walrasian equilibria in settings where they typically do not exist, such as with submodular valuations.
Contribution
It shows that even a mild endowment effect guarantees Walrasian equilibria in submodular valuation settings, linking local optima to equilibrium allocations.
Findings
Endowment effect ensures Walrasian equilibria with submodular valuations.
Any local optimum can serve as an equilibrium allocation.
Lower bounds on the endowment effect needed for equilibrium existence.
Abstract
We study combinatorial auctions with bidders that exhibit endowment effect. In most of the previous work on cognitive biases in algorithmic game theory (e.g., [Kleinberg and Oren, EC'14] and its follow-ups) the focus was on analyzing the implications and mitigating their negative consequences. In contrast, in this paper we show how in some cases cognitive biases can be harnessed to obtain better outcomes. Specifically, we study Walrasian equilibria in combinatorial markets. It is well known that Walrasian equilibria exist only in limited settings, e.g., when all valuations are gross substitutes, but fails to exist in more general settings, e.g., when the valuations are submodular. We consider combinatorial settings in which bidders exhibit the endowment effect, that is, their value for items increases with ownership. Our main result shows that when the valuations are submodular,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAuction Theory and Applications · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Economic theories and models
