TL;DR
This paper introduces a human-model similarity (HMS) metric that measures how closely neural network activation patterns resemble human brain responses, and finds that higher HMS correlates with better visual task performance.
Contribution
The paper proposes a novel HMS metric based on fMRI and network activation similarity, linking brain-like behavior to improved neural network performance.
Findings
Higher HMS correlates with better task performance.
HMS can serve as an early-stopping criterion during training.
Networks with high HMS exhibit superior generalization.
Abstract
Neuroscience theory posits that the brain's visual system coarsely identifies broad object categories via neural activation patterns, with similar objects producing similar neural responses. Artificial neural networks also have internal activation behavior in response to stimuli. We hypothesize that networks exhibiting brain-like activation behavior will demonstrate brain-like characteristics, e.g., stronger generalization capabilities. In this paper we introduce a human-model similarity (HMS) metric, which quantifies the similarity of human fMRI and network activation behavior. To calculate HMS, representational dissimilarity matrices (RDMs) are created as abstractions of activation behavior, measured by the correlations of activations to stimulus pairs. HMS is then the correlation between the fMRI RDM and the neural network RDM across all stimulus pairs. We test the metric on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
