A principle for converting Lindstr\"om-type lemmas to Stembridge-type theorems, with applications to walks, groves, and alternating flows
Owen Biesel

TL;DR
This paper establishes a general principle connecting Lindström-type lemmas to Stembridge-type theorems, extending their applicability to walks, groves, and alternating flows, with implications for combinatorial and algebraic structures.
Contribution
It introduces a unifying framework that translates Lindström-type determinant relations into Stembridge-type Pfaffian relations, broadening the scope of combinatorial identities.
Findings
Generalization of Lindström's lemma to walks on directed graphs
Conversion of determinant relations to Pfaffian relations
Applications to groves and alternating flows in combinatorics
Abstract
We prove that Fomin's generalization of Lindstr\"om's lemma for paths on acyclic directed graphs to walks on general directed graphs also generalizes a theorem of Stembridge in the same way. Moreover, we show that whenever a family of operations satisfies a Lindstr\"om-type determinant relation, a related family of operations satisfies a Stembridge-type Pfaffian relation. We give example applications to Kenyon and Wilson's work on groves and to Talaska's work on alternating flows.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
