Few self-involved agents among BC agents can lead to polarized local or global consensus
Sylvie Huet, Jean-Denis Mathias

TL;DR
This paper models how a small number of self-involved agents can influence the emergence of polarized or moderate consensus norms in social groups through attitude dynamics on multiple issues.
Contribution
It introduces a novel individual-based model combining self-involved and non-self-involved agents to study norm formation and polarization on multiple issues.
Findings
Few self-involved agents can lead to polarization or consensus.
Different attitude dynamics produce diverse norm outcomes.
Minor clusters can influence overall social norms.
Abstract
Social issues are generally discussed by highly-involved and less-involved people to build social norms defining what has to be thought and done about them. As self-involved agents share different attitude dynamics to other agents Wood, Pool et al, 1996, we study the emergence and evolution of norms through an individual-based model involving these two types of agents. The dynamics of self-involved agents is drawn from Huet and Deffuant, 2010, and the dynamics of others, from Deffuant et al, 2001. The attitude of an agent is represented as a segment on a continuous attitudinal space. Two agents are close if their attitude segments share sufficient overlap. Our agents discuss two different issues, one of which, called main issue, is more important for the self-involved agents than the other, called secondary issue. Self-involved agents are attracted on both issues if they are close on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOpinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Complex Network Analysis Techniques · Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
