Magnetar Signature - The U Curve
Vikram Soni, Dipankar Bhattacharya, Sameer Patel, Sajal Gupta,, Prasanta Bera

TL;DR
This paper investigates magnetar signatures, focusing on period closures and X-ray decline, comparing dynamo and screened core models, and introduces a 'U' curve relationship between energy loss and X-ray luminosity.
Contribution
It proposes a screened core model explaining magnetar magnetic field evolution and the observed 'U' curve in the ratio of energy loss to X-ray luminosity.
Findings
The 'U' curve indicates exponential decline in X-ray luminosity leads to period closure.
Screened core model predicts increasing magnetic field to the final value over time.
Dynamo model predicts decreasing polar magnetic field with time.
Abstract
This work looks at some definitive signatures of magnetars, in particular of period closures accompanied by a decline of X-ray radiation in two models. We review some of the previous works which are based on the well known dynamo model in which the star is born with a period of a few milliseconds at high temperatures. In such a convection regime the dynamo mechanism can amplify the the magnetic fields to the magnetar value. This is in contrast to a screened core model which posits that a high density phase transition occurs in the inner core of magnetars that dynamically aligns all the neutron magnetic moments producing a large magnetic field in the core. The accompanying change of flux gives rise to shielding or screening currents in the surrounding high conductivity plasma that do not permit the field to exit to the surface. Ambipolar diffusion then transports the field to the crust…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
