Efficient radiative transfer techniques in hydrodynamic simulations
Anthony Mercer, Dimitris Stamatellos, Alex Dunhill

TL;DR
This paper compares two approximate radiative transfer methods in hydrodynamic simulations, showing their accuracy in different configurations and highlighting limitations of the constant beta-cooling approximation in modeling protostellar discs.
Contribution
It evaluates and compares the effectiveness of two approximate radiative transfer techniques and discusses the limitations of the beta-cooling approximation in protostellar disc simulations.
Findings
Both methods are accurate for spherical configurations.
The pressure scale-height method is more accurate in protostellar discs.
Constant beta-cooling cannot capture the variability in cooling processes.
Abstract
Radiative transfer is an important component of hydrodynamic simulations as it determines the thermal properties of a physical system. It is especially important in cases where heating and cooling regulate significant processes, such as in the collapse of molecular clouds, the development of gravitational instabilities in protostellar discs, disc-planet interactions, and planet migration. We compare two approximate radiative transfer methods which indirectly estimate optical depths within hydrodynamic simulations using two different metrics: (i) the gravitational potential and density of the gas (Stamatellos et al.), and (ii) the pressure scale-height (Lombardi et al.). We find that both methods are accurate for spherical configurations e.g. in collapsing molecular clouds and within clumps that form in protostellar discs. However, the pressure scale-height approach is more accurate in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
