Performance of a segmented $^{6}$Li-loaded liquid scintillator detector for the PROSPECT experiment
J. Ashenfelter, A. B. Balantekin, H. R. Band, C. D. Bass, D. E., Bergeron, D. Berish, N. S. Bowden, J. P. Brodsky, C. D. Bryan, A. Bykadorova, Telles, J. J. Cherwinka, T. Classen, K. Commeford, A. Conant, D. Davee, G., Deichert, M. V. Diwan, M. J. Dolinski, A. Erickson

TL;DR
This paper presents the design and performance evaluation of a 50-liter $^{6}$Li-loaded liquid scintillator detector prototype for the PROSPECT experiment, demonstrating high light collection, good energy resolution, and effective neutron detection capabilities.
Contribution
The paper introduces a prototype detector with optimized design features that meet PROSPECT's requirements and showcases its performance metrics and stability.
Findings
High light collection of 850 PE/MeV achieved
Energy resolution of 4.0% at 1 MeV demonstrated
Efficient pulse-shape discrimination and neutron capture detection
Abstract
This paper describes the design and performance of a 50 liter, two-segment Li-loaded liquid scintillator detector that was designed and operated as prototype for the PROSPECT (Precision Reactor Oscillation and Spectrum) Experiment. The two-segment detector was constructed according to the design specifications of the experiment. It features low-mass optical separators, an integrated source and optical calibration system, and materials that are compatible with the Li-doped scintillator developed by PROSPECT. We demonstrate a high light collection of 85020 PE/MeV, an energy resolution of = 4.00.2% at 1 MeV, and efficient pulse-shape discrimination of low (electronic recoil) and high (nuclear recoil) energy depositions. An effective scintillation attenuation length of 853 cm is measured in each segment. The 0.1% by mass concentration of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
