Distinguishing Standard from Modified Gravity in the Local Group and beyond
Indranil Banik

TL;DR
This paper compares standard dark matter models and Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) in explaining galaxy motions, proposing new tests involving galaxy velocities and the Local Group to distinguish between these theories.
Contribution
It introduces observational tests using galaxy velocities and the Local Group to differentiate between MOND and dark matter-based cosmology.
Findings
High-velocity galaxy candidates are consistent with MOND predictions.
The MOND-based escape velocity curve aligns with observations.
Potential evidence of past close flyby in the Local Group supports MOND.
Abstract
The works in this portfolio test the hypothesis that it is not possible to extrapolate the Newtonian inverse square law of gravity from Solar System to galaxy scales. In particular, I look into various tests of Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND), which posits a modification below a very low acceleration threshold. Although discrepancies with Newtonian dynamics are indeed observed, they can usually be explained by invoking an appropriate distribution of invisible mass known as dark matter (DM). This leads to the standard cosmological paradigm, CDM. I consider how it may be distinguished from MOND using collision velocities of galaxy clusters, which should sometimes be much faster in MOND. I focus on measuring these velocities more accurately and conclude that this test ought to be feasible in the near future. For the time being, I look at the much nearer and more accurately…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
