KMT-2016-BLG-1107: A New Hollywood-Planet Close/Wide Degeneracy
Kyu-Ha Hwang, Yoon-Hyun Ryu, Hyoun-Woo Kim, Michael D. Albrow, Sun-Ju, Chung, Andrew Gould, Cheongho Han, Youn Kil Jung, In-Gu Shin, Yossi, Shvartzvald, Jennifer C. Yee, Weicheng Zang, Sang-Mok Cha, Dong-Jin Kim,, Seung-Lee Kim, Chung-Uk Lee, Dong-Joo Lee, Yongseok Lee

TL;DR
This paper identifies a new degeneracy in microlensing events where a giant-star source can produce similar light curve anomalies under different binary configurations, complicating the interpretation of planetary signals.
Contribution
The study introduces a novel degeneracy between close and wide binary microlensing events involving giant-star sources, with methods to distinguish solutions using future high-resolution imaging.
Findings
A new degeneracy between close and wide binary microlensing events was identified.
High-resolution imaging can resolve the degeneracy in future observations.
Analytic conditions for the degeneracy's occurrence are provided.
Abstract
We show that microlensing event KMT-2016-BLG-1107 displays a new type of degeneracy between wide-binary and close-binary Hollywood events in which a giant-star source envelops the planetary caustic. The planetary anomaly takes the form of a smooth, two-day "bump" far out on the falling wing of the light curve, which can be interpreted either as the source completely enveloping a minor-image caustic due to a close companion with mass ratio , or partially enveloping a major-image caustic due to a wide companion with . The best estimates of the companion masses are both in the planetary regime ( and ) but differ by an even larger factor than the mass ratios due to different inferred host masses. We show that the two solutions can be distinguished by high-resolution imaging at first light on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
