Possible Worlds, Incompleteness and Undefinability
Christopher F. S. Maligec

TL;DR
This paper explores how a broader G"odel numbering approach to possible worlds can create two-world systems that avoid undecidable sentences and the Liar paradox, offering insights into logical consistency.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach to G"odel numbering that simplifies the handling of possible worlds and bypasses classical logical paradoxes.
Findings
Two-world systems can avoid undecidable sentences
Broader G"odel numbering helps sidestep the Liar paradox
New perspective on possible worlds and logical consistency
Abstract
This short squib looks at how using a broader definition of G\"odel numbering to mimic the accessibility relation between possible worlds results in two-world systems that sidestep undecidable sentences as well as the Liar paradox.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
