Optimising data for modelling neuronal responses
Peter Zeidman, Samira M Kazan, Nick Todd, Nikolaus Weiskopf, Karl J., Friston, Martina F. Callaghan

TL;DR
This paper introduces a Bayesian framework for comparing neuroimaging datasets to determine which best supports neuronal response modeling, focusing on parameter estimation precision and model discrimination.
Contribution
It presents a novel Bayesian data comparison method for neuroimaging, integrating DCM and Bayesian GLM to evaluate dataset quality for neuronal response inference.
Findings
Compared four multiband fMRI datasets
Demonstrated the framework's ability to evaluate data quality
Provided reproducible Matlab code for broader use
Abstract
In this technical note, we address an unresolved challenge in neuroimaging statistics: how to determine which of several datasets is the best for inferring neuronal responses. Comparisons of this kind are important for experimenters when choosing an imaging protocol - and for developers of new acquisition methods. However, the hypothesis that one dataset is better than another cannot be tested using conventional statistics (based on likelihood ratios), as these require the data to be the same under each hypothesis. Here we present Bayesian data comparison, a principled framework for evaluating the quality of functional imaging data, in terms of the precision with which neuronal connectivity parameters can be estimated and competing models can be disambiguated. For each of several candidate datasets, neuronal responses are inferred using Dynamic Casual Modelling (DCM) - a commonly used…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
