Consistent Iron Abundances Derived from Neutral and Singly-Ionized Iron Lines in Ultraviolet and Optical Spectra of Six Warm Metal-Poor Stars
Ian U. Roederer, Christopher Sneden, James E. Lawler, Jennifer S., Sobeck, John J. Cowan, Ann Merchant Boesgaard

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that consistent iron abundances can be derived from neutral and ionized Fe lines in ultraviolet and optical spectra of six warm, metal-poor stars, supporting non-LTE calculations within certain parameters.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence that Fe I and Fe II lines yield consistent abundances in warm metal-poor stars when strong lines are excluded, refining our understanding of non-LTE effects.
Findings
Fe I and Fe II derived abundances agree within uncertainties
Exclusion of strong and low excitation lines reduces discrepancies
No full explanation for lower Fe I abundances in the Balmer continuum region
Abstract
Neutral Fe lines in metal-poor stars yield conflicting abundances depending on whether and how deviations from local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) are considered. We have collected new high resolution and high signal-to-noise ultraviolet (UV) spectra of three warm dwarf stars with [Fe/H] = -2.9 with the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph on the Hubble Space Telescope. We locate archival UV spectra for three other warm dwarfs with [Fe/H] = -3.3, -2.2, and -1.6, supplemented with optical spectra for all six stars. We calculate stellar parameters using methods that are largely independent of the spectra, adopting broadband photometry, color-temperature relations, Gaia parallaxes, and assumed masses. We use the LTE line analysis code MOOG to derive Fe abundances from hundreds of Fe I and Fe II lines with wavelengths from 2290 to 6430 Angstroms. The [Fe/H] ratios derived separately from…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
